The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Venkat Narhari Patil

{1} ca2614.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2614 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 38962 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 2618 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 39027 OF 2018 Mr. A. B. Chate, AGP for the Applicants CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 13th February, 2023.

PC :

Heard learned AGP for the applicants.

The respondents claimants, despite service, remained absent. The applicant-State-acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay of 2473 days, in both these applications, which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages.

Hence, by considering the statutory right of the applicants, delay of 2473 days stands condoned. Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb

{2} ca2614.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2615 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 38962 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 2619 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 39027 OF 2018 Mr. A. B. Chate, AGP for the Applicants CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 13th February, 2023.

PC :

Heard learned AGP for the applicant-acquiring body. The respondent-claimants, though served, but remained absent. There shall be stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award in terms of prayer clause {B} subject to the condition that the State-acquiring body shall deposit entire amount of the impugned awards along with the interest within twelve weeks.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb