Asaram Raoji Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 904 CA-4206.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4206 OF 2020 IN FAST/38996/2018 ASARAM RAOJI JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Vitthal Wayal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

26th April 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1969 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained and there is circulation delay also. The Acquiring Body, though served, but remained absent.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 1969 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not

(2) 904 CA-4206.2020.odt claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde