Rajendra Bhagwantrao Mudholkar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) wp453.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.453 OF 2019 RAJENDRA BHAGWANTRAO MUDHOLKAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. S.K.Mathpati, Advocate for the petitioners Mrs. M.A.Deshpande, AGP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.

DATED :

17.01.2019 P.C. :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners are before this court seeking directions to the respondent authorities for grant of pension to these petitioners as per revised pension formula. The learned counsel for the petitioners by placing on record an order passed by this Court dated 06.08.2018 in Writ Petition No.8882 of 2018 submitted that the petitioners are identically circumstanced with the petitioners in Writ Petition No.8882 of 2018. The Division Bench of this Court considered the grievance raised by the petitioners and disposed the writ petition with observations that the respondent/State shall consider the case of the petitioners for payment of revised pension as per Government Resolution dated 30.10.2009. The petitioners were also permitted to submit representation to that effect to the respondent/State.

( 2 ) wp453.19 3.

The learned AGP submitted before us that the grievance of the petitioners would be redressed, in view of the latest Government Resolution dated 27.12.2018. Perusal of the Government Resolution dated 27.12.2018 shows that it refers to the representation filed in this Court and then it is said that in view of the order passed by this Court, the State Government thought it fit to come with a policy and grant the benefits to the retired employees. It may not be necessary for us to refer to the details of the Government Resolution. Suffice it to say that the learned AGP was justified in submitting before us that the Government Resolution takes care of the grievance of the petitioners and in view of the Government Resolution, the grievance of the petitioners would be redressed.

4.

In view of these facts, nothing survives in the petition. The documents placed on record by the respective counsel, namely, the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP are marks as 'X' and 'X-1' for identification.

5.

The petition accordingly is disposed of.

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.] / .19 ssp Jan /wp453.19