Shubham Ganpat Arle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2023:BHC-AUG:26330-DB 902-WP-15162-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15162 OF 2023 SHUBHAM GANPAT ARLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ....

Mr. M. U. Shelke, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Nitin Jagadale, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE:14.12.2023 PER COURT :- 1.

By this Petition, the Petitioner has prayed that Respondent No.2 Tahsildar, Ambad, should be restrained from proceeding to decide pending proceedings before him on account of several reasons set out in the pleadings. When this matter was heard on 12.12.2023, it was noticed that the date of hearing before the Tahsildar was 07.12.2023. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner had no idea as to at what stage the proceeding is as on 07.12.2023.

(( 2 )) 902-WP-15162-2023 2.

Today, the learned AGP submits on instructions that the concerned authority has delivered a verdict on 08.12.2023, after hearing the oral arguments of the parties on 07.12.2023 and on perusing the written submissions. A copy of the order has been handed over to the learned Advocate for the Petitioner. 3.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to challenge the said order before the competent higher authority.

4.

In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off. All the contentions of the litigating parties are kept open. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] SMS