Balaji Maroti Mundkar v. Nandkumar And Others

(1) 1093-cp-18-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1093 CONT. PETITION NO. 18 OF 2018 IN WP/10091/2014 BALAJI MAROTI MUNDKAR ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

NANDKUMAR AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrikrashna B. Solanke, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. B. Yavalkar, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 26th JULY, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

Mr. Solanke, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the contempt petition, the respondent has cancelled the order of approval.

2.

In view of that, the petitioner will have to assail the order rejecting approval. The same can be done by the petitioner in appropriate proceedings.

3.

Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-18