Nandkumar Laxman Rahinj v. The State Of Maharashtra
2025:BHC-AUG:36200-DB 1 926-911-910-916.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 926 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 654 OF 2024 IN WP/14722/2023 MAYURESH PRADIP DALE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. R.Kale, AGP for Respondent/State Ms. Akanksha Salgar, Advocate h/f Mr. Prakash S. Paranjape, Advocate for Respondent No.4 ...
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2024 IN WP/14049/2023 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 157 OF 2024 IN WP/13082/2023 ...
910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2025 IN WP/1400/2025 SHUBHANGI VASANT RAUT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent/State ...
911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1078 OF 2025 IN WP/14722/2023 VAISHALI AMBADAS SARODE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent/State ...
915 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 989 OF 2025 IN WP/14722/2023 NANDKUMAR LAXMAN RAHINJ AND OTHERS
VERSUS
2 926-911-910-916.odt THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondent/State ...
916 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 991 OF 2025 IN WP/15639/2023 PRIYANKA LAXMAN GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent/State ...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :
1.
Petitioners have submitted their undertaking before this Court. Petitioners shall submit the same before the Deputy Director of Education.
2.
Learned advocate for petitioners submits that Writ Petition No.3530/2018 and connected matters of similarly situated Assistant Lecturers who had approached to the Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat for directions, was allowed by order dated 13/09/2021 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat [Coram : R. D. Dhanuka and Abhay Ahuja, J.J.] and it was directed to the State Government to grant approval to the appointment of petitioners therein who were parties to the consent terms. He, further submits that the petitioners herein were persons
3 926-911-910-916.odt appointed pursuant to the consent terms and therefore, they are entitled for the same relief.
3.
We cannot go into the merits in contempt jurisdiction. In the peculiar facts of the case, we direct the petitioners to submit undertaking before the Deputy Director of Education and appear before him on 06/01/2026. The Deputy Director shall after hearing the petitioners and by taking into consideration the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat in the cases of similarly situated petitioners, take appropriate decision in the cases of petitioners within four weeks thereafter.
4.
With these directions the contempt petitions are disposed of. Failure to follow the time stipulation mentioned above shall be treated as aggravated form of contempt. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)