Arun Shivram Idhate And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

ca15169-18 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15169 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6528 OF 2015 Arun Shivram Idhate and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent - State Mr. R. V. Naiknavare, Advocate for respondent No. 3 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 8 th JANUARY, 2019 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

Having regard to the reasons as are appearing in paragraphs No. 2, 3 and 4 of the civil application, it appears to be expedient to grant the application. Accordingly, civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE drp/ca15169-18

ca15169-18 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6528 OF 2015 Arun Shivram Idhate and Others PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent - State Mr. R. V. Naiknavare, Advocate for respondent No. 3 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 8 th JANUARY, 2019 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the petitioners urges for interim relief stating that there is grave apprehension of removal of construction.

2.

Learned advocate Mr. R. V. Naiknavare states that encroachment on road has already been removed. 3.

In the circumstances, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause "D", if encroachment is not already removed. 4.

Put up the writ petition for admission on 12th February, 2019.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE drp/ca15169-18