Sanjyot Sumitra Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 939-950-959

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2020 AYODHYA DIGAMBAR KUDAKE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH 950 WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2020 KASHINATH GOVIND AUTI ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH 959 WRIT PETITION NO.403 OF 2020 SANJYOT SUMITRA SHINDE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Mahesh S. Bhosale, Advocate for the Petitioners in all Writ Petitions.

Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 08th JANUARY, 2020.

PER COURT:- 1.

The learned counsel submits that the request of petitioners for couple convenience has not considered by the Chief Executive Officer.

(2) 939-950-959 2.

As per the Government Resolution dated 28.05.2019, the Chief Executive Officer has to consider the claim with regard to the transfer. 3.

In light of that, the Chief Executive Officer shall take decision on the application filed by the petitioners preferably within a period of one month from the date of the present order being communicated to him.

4.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/January-2020