← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/10/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Raver Shikshan Sanvardhak Sangh Raver Through The Chairman And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2018-03-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

1 cp 5.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1276 OF 2017 Raver Shikshan Sanvardhak Sangh, Raver Through the Chairman and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1274 OF 2017 Raver Shikshan Sanvardhak Sangh, Raver Through the Chairman and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1277 OF 2017 Raver Shikshan Sanvardhak Sangh, Raver Through the Chairman and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 12 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1275 OF 2017

2 cp 5.18 Raver Shikshan Sanvardhak Sangh, Raver Through the Chairman and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent / State. Respondent No. 2 served.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 6 th March, 2018 PER COURT :

1.

Learned A.G.P. submits that the proposals are decided. 2.

Mr. Bhokarikar, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that those are belatedly decided and contrary to law. 3.

As the proposals are decided, though belatedly, contempt stands purged.

4.

The petitioner is at liberty to assail the orders as may be permissible in law.

5.

The contempt petitions stand disposed of. No costs. [A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe