← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/4/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Shikshan Vikas Mandal Vivre Through Chairman J M Pachpande And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2018-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale1 pages

1 cp 4.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4712 OF 2017 Shikshan Vikas Mandal Vivre, Through Chairman and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl. G. P. for Respondent / State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 27 th March, 2018 PER COURT :

1.

The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the representation of the petitioner is decided. 2.

In view of that, though belatedly, contempt stands purged. Contempt petition is disposed of. No costs.

3.

Needless to state, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the said order as may be permissible in law.

[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe