Nanasaheb Babasaheb Dharbale And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2024:BHC-AUG:9453-DB 976.CP.388.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14767 OF 2023 IN CP/420/2023 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14768 OF 2023 IN CP/388/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14769 OF 2023 IN CP/253/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14770 OF 2023 IN CP/268/2018 SANDEEPKUMAR SUBHASHCHANDRA LAHOTI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF TECHNICAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gadhe Ganesh Asaram Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : Mr. G.L. Kedar h/f. Mr. A.M. Karad ( in all applications respectively) ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 02.05.2024 PER COURT:

These are the civil applications filed by the original petitioners in these respective contempt petitions seeking withdrawal of the amounts as mentioned in the chart.

2.

The learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the contesting respondent for the Management has expressly consented for 1/2

976.CP.388.2020.odt withdrawal of part of the amount by putting up an endorsement in his own handwriting and under his signature on the copy of the application. Learned advocate representing him has not counter signed this endorsement. One Mr. G.L. Kedar holding for Mr. Karad who represents the respondent No.4 admits that indeed the respondent No.4 has signed and has given consent for petitioners to withdraw the amounts mentioned against their names by him in his handwriting. Copies of these applications are taken on record.

3.

The applications are allowed. Respective petitioners are permitted to withdraw the sum as mentioned in handwriting in blue ink. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2