← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/15204/2023disposed off

Akshay Devidas Kasbewad v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2023-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote2 pages

2023:BHC-AUG:26044-DB 1 918..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.15196 OF 2023 1.

Vaishnavi Laxman Mayklod Age : 19 years, Occu : Student, R/o. At Shimpala, Post. Hiparga Thadi, Tq. Biloli, Dist. Nanded 2.

Abhishek Laxman Mayklod, Age : 22 years, Occu : Student, R/o. At Shimpala, Post. Hiparga Thadi, Tq. Biloli, Dist. Nanded .. Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2.

Deputy Director (Research) and Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat, Headquarter Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Near CIDCO Bus Stand, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Dist. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar .. Respondents ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Om Totawad h/f. Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. M. M. Nerlikar ...

WRIT PETITION NO.15204 OF 2023 Akshay Devidas Kasbewad ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and another .. Respondents ...

2 918..odt Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Om Totawad h/f. Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat AGP for the Respondent / State : Mr. G. A. Kulkarni ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2023 PER COURT :

.

The petitioners have submitted the proposals for verification of their tribe certificates on 13.10.2023 and 04.10.2023, respectively, which are old enough to approach this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 - Scrutiny Committee to decide their proposals expeditiously.

2.

We see no reason why this Court to take initiative and issue a writ of mandamus when the petitioners for all these years have not taken care even to submit their proposals in advance. It cannot be said that the Committee is not discharging the duties expeditiously and as is contemplated in law.

3.

In light of the above, Writ petitions are dismissed. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [MANGESH S. PATIL] JUDGE JUDGE GGP