Raju Namdeo Dhumnar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ba2238.23 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2238 OF 2023 Raju Namdeo Dhumnar

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and another ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.N. Chavan h/f Mr. Harshal P. Randhir APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. Satish A. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Sarin Karishma Sanjay .....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 7th FEBRUARY, 2024.

PER COURT :- 1.

After hearing learned advocates for the parties, when the court expressed disinclination to grant bail, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. 2.

Leave granted. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

3.

Fees of learned advocate appointed to represent the cause of respondent No.2 be paid as the schedule of fees maintained by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/