← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/15234/2025disposed off

Kai Chandrakuwar Shaikshnik Samajik Mahila Vikas Sanstha Thr Its President v. The Union Of India Through Secretary And Others

2025-12-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:35929-DB p7 and p8.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.15234 OF 2025 Kai Chandrakuwar Shaikshnik Samajik Mahila Vikas Sanstha Through its President Chandrakala Chandrashekhar Sisodiya

Versus

The Union of India and others ...

Mr. A. C. Sisodiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. S. Salunke, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. Nilesh Desale, Advocate for respondent No.5. ...

AND WRIT PETITION NO.15235 OF 2025 Dnyanopasak Shikshan Mandal Through its Principal Anshul Kapoor

Versus

The Union of India Through Secretary and others ...

Mr. A. C. Sisodiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. S. Salunke, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. Nilesh Desale, Advocate for respondent No.5. ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 16 DECEMBER 2025 ORDER :

.

These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of [1]

p7 and p8.odt Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice for respondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Central Government Counsel Mr. N. S. Salunke waives notice for respondent/Union of India in both the petitions. Learned Advocate Mr. Nilesh Desale waives notice for respondent No.5/Zilla Parishad in both the petitions. 3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners' proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]