← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14816/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Sau Rukhmini Babasaheb Solanke Solunke v. The State Of Maharashtra Throught Its Slao Special Unit Aurangabad And ANR

2023-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2023:BHC-AUG:26791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 947 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14816 OF 2023 IN FA/3827/2023 SAU RUKHMINI BABASAHEB SOLANKE SOLUNKE ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SLAO SPECIAL UNIT AURANGABAD AND ANR .....Respondent .....

AND 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14817 OF 2023 IN FA/3482/2023 SAU RUKHMINI BALASAHEB BABASAHEB SOLUNKE ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SLAO SPECIAL UNIT AURANGABAD AND ANR .....Respondent ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. U. R. Awate h/f Talekar And Associates, , AGP for Respondents-State : Mrs. M. L. Sangit Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. V. Deshmukh ...

(CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) Dated: December 14, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the present application is moved by Sau. Rukhmini Babasaheb Solanke Solunke.

947 CA 14816-2023 He submits that in the Reference Court Award the same is mentioned as "Rukhmini Balasaheb Soluanke' and in the First Appeal No.3482/2023 name of the appellant is shown as 'Rukhmini Balasaheb Solunke.

2.

The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in all these places the other details of the applicant are same. The age is 52 years, occupation Agriculturists, resident of Shivsamadhan Col, Itkheda Parisar, Tq:Dist: Aurangabad. He submits that all the above names are of one and the same person i.e. Rukhmini Babasaheb Solunke and that the minor errors have occurred. 3.

Since the person is one and the same, the application is allowed and in all places the applicant 'Rukhmini Babasaheb Solunke' be shown.

4.

Registry to rectify the name and to release the amount in favour of claimant as directed. The application is disposed of. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.