Vinayak Vitthal Chame And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp 4646.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 WRIT PETITION NO.4646 OF 2018 VINAYAK VITTHAL CHAME AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.B.M.Dhanure AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.G. Karlekar ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ. Date: December 14, 2018 ...

PER COURT :- We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned AGP for the State.

It is not in dispute that the land of the petitioners is acquired. Even Notification under section 4, Declaration under section 6 and the Notices under section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are issued to the petitioners. However, Award is not passed. The possession of the petitioners' land is already taken on 31.9.2010. It is also admitted in the affidavit filed by the Deputy Engineer, Public Works Subdivision No.2, Latur that under letter dated 19.10.2018, detail proposal for acquisition of the land and to declare fresh Award under the Right to Fair

{2} wp 4646.18.odt Compensation Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 is submitted.

Respondents shall initiate proceedings of land acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 expeditiously and preferably within six weeks from today and shall complete within the time stipulated under the said Act. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. ( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) vbd