Chandrakant Gangadhar Suraywanshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
1 964 to 969 ca 5344-2+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5344 OF 2022 IN FAST/39370/2019 CHANDRAKANT GANGADHAR SURAYWANSHI AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. N. Kendre ...
AND 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5378 OF 2022 IN FAST/39394/2019 VENKAT NAMDEO SURAYWANSHI AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...
AND 966 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5396 OF 2022 IN FAST/39359/2019 TUKARAM PANDURANG SURAYWANSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. N. Kendre ...
AND 967 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5470 OF 2022 IN FAST/39351/2019 TUKARAM PANDURANG SURAYWANSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil
2 964 to 969 ca 5344-2+ AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. A. B. Chate ...
AND 968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5532 OF 2022 IN FAST/39347/2019 TUKARAM PANDURANG SURAYWANSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...
AND 969 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5536 OF 2022 IN FAST/39298/2019 HULLAJI RAGHUNATH SURYAWANSHI (DIED) THR LRS JIJABAI AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. N. Kendre ....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 24/01/2023.
P. C. :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned therein, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.
The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay and no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent.
3 964 to 969 ca 5344-2+ 4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly. 5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
6.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-