← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/952/2023disposed off

Girdharising Balajising Chandile v. Through District Collector And District Magistrate

2024-02-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:3064-DB 95.CP.952.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 952 OF 2023 IN WP/3131/2022 1.

Girdharising Balajising Chandile, 2.

Balajising Govindsing Chandile, 3.

Bhagwan Parbhu Dewakate, 4.

Shivaji Babarao Jadhav, 5.

Laxminarayan Balajising Chandile, 6.

Deelipsing Partapsing Chandile, 7.

Gokulsing Balajising Chandile, 8.

Waman Shyamrao Thorat, 9.

Babu Shyamrao Thorat, ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra through District Collector and District Magistrate, Latur, Dist. Latur 2.

Mr.Pravin Baburao Phulari, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, (Swarna Project), Latur, (At present office of Sub-Divisional Officer, At Ahmedpur, Tq.Ahmedpur, Dist.Latur) 3.

The Executive Engineer, Medium Irrigation Division, Latur, Tq. and Dist. Latur.

...

RESPONDENTS ...

Addl. G.P. for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 12.02.2024 PER COURT:

None present for the petitioners. Learned APP tenders across the bar affidavit-in-reply together with annexure inter alia pointed out that pursuant to the directions of this Court the petitioners' claim 1/2

95.CP.952.23.odt regarding rental compensation has been decided on its own merits. It has been allowed.

2.

However, the direction of which implementation is being sought in the present contempt petition merely expected the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioners' application on merit without there being any further direction. Nothing survives. The contempt petition is disposed of.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2