Vandana Santosh Pawale v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:753-DB ( 1 ) 1005 wp 348.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1005 WRIT PETITION NO. 348 OF 2024 VANDANA SANTOSH PAWALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kamble Dinkar G. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya Advocate for R/2 : Mr. S.N. Janakwade ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 9th January, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

The Petitioner claims to be the daughter of an employee. That employee is aggrieved by the non payment of the retiral benefits. He is not before this Court. The petition is filed by the daughter without any pleadings in the memo or even a statement in the verification that she has been authorized by the father to file this petition. 2.

The learned advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will withdraw this petition and her father will file the petition claiming his retiral benefits.

3.

With the above liberty, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn. [Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] mub