← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/239/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Dnyan Prasarak Mandal Yermala Through Its Secretary Ashokrao Dnyandeo Mohekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane2 pages

239.18WP FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 239 OF 2018 DNYAN PRASARAK MANDAL YERMALA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ASHOKRAO DNYANDEO MOHEKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for petitioner : Mr. B.A. Dhengle AGP for the respondent/State:Mr.S.S. Dande ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

Dated: February 02, 2018 ...

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2.

Perused the pleadings in the Petition, grounds taken therein and documents placed on record.

3.

The contention of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that in absence of any permission and recognition, Respondent No.7 is running 8th standard. He invites our attention to

239.18WP the letter written by Respondent No.5 to Respondent No.6 directing him to take steps to close 8th standard run by Respondent No.7.

4.

Upon careful perusal of the documents placed on record, none of the documents even slightly show that, Respondent Nos.1 to 6 have approved/allowed or indicated to Respondent No.7 to run 8th standard.

Whether Respondent No.7 is conducting the classes of 8th standard or not is also not clear. Therefore, in the facts of this Petition, we find it difficult to issue any writ to Respondent No.6. The Petition raises disputed questions of facts and therefore, it is not desirable to entertain the said disputed questions in writ jurisdiction. Hence we decline to entertain this Writ Petition.

Accordingly, the Petition stands rejected.

(S. M. GAVHANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE,J) SGA/