← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/746/2020disposed offdismissed for default

Ram Sukhadev Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.746 OF 2020 (Ram Sukhadev Shinde Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ---- Mr. E.S. Murge, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.P. Tiwari, A.G.P. for the respondent/State Mr. A.D. Aghav, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 ---- CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 13.01.2020 PER COURT :

We have heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader and learned counsel for Ahmednagar Zilla Parishad.

2] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a District awardee teachers prior to 04/09/2018. 3] For the first time additional increment was given to the District awardee teachers under Govt. Resolution dated 12/12/2000. Pursuant thereto, additional increments as per the said Govt. Resolution were given.

4] There are other categories of awardee teachers such as State awardee teachers, national awardee teachers and the award being given for excellent/outstanding work. In the present case, we are concerned only with the District awardee teachers.

wp746-2020 5] Upon perusal of various Govt. Resolutions placed on record, it does not appear that prior to the Govt. Resolution dated 04/09/2018, there was any Govt. Resolution taking away benefit of the additional increment given to District awardee teachers. Of - course, now, no District awardee teacher would be entitled for the benefit in view of the Govt. Resolution dated 04/09/2018. However, Govt. Resolution dated 04/09/2018 can not be given retrospective effect.

6] Govt. Resolution relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent/Zilla Parishad viz. Govt. Resolution dated 27/02/2009 is general in nature. It only states that the committee formed by the Government has made recommendation and the same is to be accepted with certain modifications. Under the Govt. Resolution dated 24/08/2017, the Government has taken decision that the benefit of advance increment would not be available to those who were granted certificate of excellent work. It is under the Govt. Resolution dated 04/09/2018 now the benefit of additional increment to the District awardee teacher can not be given. 7] However, all those who were granted certificate of District awardee teacher prior to 04/09/2018 can not be denied the said benefit of additional increment.

8] In light of the above, we pass the following order.

ORDER

A.

The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 / Zilla Parishad after confirming themselves of the petitioner being District awardee teacher and awarded certificate prior to 04/09/2018 shall consider the case of the petitioner for additional increment as is laid down under the Govt. Resolution dated 12/12/2000. The same shall be considered on its own merits expeditiously

wp746-2020 preferably within a period of six (06) months from today. B.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. [MANGESH S. PATIL] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE npj/wp746-2020