← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14171/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Govind Nivruti Mashal. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Latur And ORS.

2025-12-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav3 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:37487

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14145 OF 2025 IN FA/3718/2019 BHAGWAT RAOSAHEB BOYANE.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S.Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14173 OF 2025 IN FA/3717/2019 YANKA SAKHARAM SHELKE.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S. Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14175 OF 2025 IN FA/3716/2019 TRIMBAK S/O BAPURAO SHELKE DIED THROUGH LRS TRIVENIBAI AND ORS.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S.Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14171 OF 2025 IN FA/3714/2019 GOVIND NIVRUTI MASHAL.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S.Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14174 OF 2025 IN FA/3722/2019 NAMDEO BALRAM GOMARE.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S.Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14172 OF 2025 IN FA/3715/2019 ARUN LINGRAM CHAMLE.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S.Panale AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. N.B. Kamble ...

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 24th DECEMBER, 2025.

ORDER :

.

These applications are filed for withdrawal of amount deposited in this Court along with accrued interest. Further prayer is made for discharge of bank guarantee and solvent surety furnished by the applicants after disposal of the first appeals. 2.

The applicants are the original claimants, who succeeded in L.A.R. proceedings. Against the judgment of the Land Acquisition References, the State had filed Appeals before this Court. This Court

decided the First Appeals vide common judgment on 16.12.2025. 3.

During pendency of the appeals, the applicants are already withdrawn 75% of the amount on condition of furnishing solvent surety to the extent of some amount and bank guarantee to the extent of some amount. Now in view of disposal of the appeals, the applicants pray for withdrawal of the remaining amount, which is lying in the office of this Court.

4.

Heard learned Advocates for the parties.

5.

Considering the fact that the First Appeals are already disposed off, these applications can be allowed. The applications therefore are allowed. The applicants are permitted to withdraw the amount lying in the office of this Court with accrued interest. Bank guarantee and solvent surety stands discharged. 6.

With this, the applications stand disposed off. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT ,J.) sga