Pramod Ratnakar Lalsare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
(1) 910-923-927-944
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 WRIT PETITION NO.960 OF 2020 AMOLSINH PRATAPSINH GOUR ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS AND 923 WRIT PETITION NO.1024 OF 2020 PRAMOD RATNAKAR LALSARE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS AND 927 WRIT PETITION NO.1028 OF 2020 SANJAY BHABNUDAS PATIL AND OTHERS ..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS AND 944 WRIT PETITION NO.1085 OF 2020 SANJAYKUMAR DEVIDAS PATIL AND OTHERS..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...
Mr. S. B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioners in all Writ Petitions.
Mrs. G. L. Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State. ...
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 16th JANUARY, 2020.
(2) 910-923-927-944 PER COURT:- 1.
It is submitted that the petitioners have been awarded certificate of excellent work, however, they are not given the benefit of additional increments.
2.
We have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents-State.
3.
In case, the petitioners are awardees of the excellent work prior to 24.08.2017, then the respondent No. 3 after confirming that the petitioners are the District Awardees and awarded certificates of excellent work, shall consider the case of petitioners for additional increments as laid down under the Government Resolution governing grant of additional increments to the excellent work awardee employees. The same shall be decided on its own merits within a period of six (6) months from today.
4.
It is made clear that the Government Resolution dated 24.08.2017 does not have retrospective operation and will not be applicable to the employees who have been awarded certificate of excellent work prior to the said Government Resolution.
5.
Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/January-2020