← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/266/2007dismissedrule discharged

State Of Mah.Thr.Secy And 3 ORS. v. Bhaskar S/O Futtuji Dakare

2020-01-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi1 pages

WP266-07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 266/2007 (STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS VERSUS BHASKAR FUTTUJI DAKARE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.M. Ukey, Additional G.P. for petitioners. Shri I.S. Charlewar, counsel for respondent.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 27 , .

The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 31.03.2006 by which the said original application preferred by the respondent seeking the relief of regularization of his services on a Class-IV post has been allowed.

In the impugned order, reference is made to the earlier adjudication in O.A. No.691 of 1997 and the fact that the writ petition challenging that order had been dismissed by the High Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it is found that there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. It is undisputed that the order dated 31.01.2002 passed in O.A. No.691 of 1997 had been challenged by filing a writ petition and that challenge has been turned down. Moreover, the adjudication is in accordance with the judgment of the Hon'

ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.10064-10075 of 2010 dated 25.09.2019.

Hence, for reasons recorded in the order passed in O.A. No.691 of 1997, the present writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (VINAY JOSHI, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) APTE