Bombay High CourtWP/232/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Surendra Shyamrao Bhasme v. Zilla Parishad, Nagpur Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Nagpur And Another

2015-09-04Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

WP232-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 232/2015 (SURENDRA SHYAMRAO BHASME VERSUS ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.E. Raghorte, counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.M. Lonare, counsel for the R-1 & 2.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 4 , 2015.

Shri Lonare, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, states that the grievance of the petitioner should stand redressed as the petitioner has been transferred to SawargaonNarkhed Public Health Centre and the respondent nos.1 and 2 are also not proposing recovery against him.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE