← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/130/2021dismissed

Smt. Latabai W/O Baliram Sarokar v. Tahsildar And Returning Officer Of Gram Panchayat, Khandavi And Others

2021-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

32a wp130.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 130 OF 2021 Smt. Latabai w/o Baliram Sarokar Vs. Tahsildar and Returning Officer of Gram Panchayat Khandavi, Tq. Jalgaon Jamod, District Buldana and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri G.G. Mishra, Advocate for petitioner.

Smt. Mrunal A. Barabde, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Shri Vipul Bhise, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shri Ram Karode, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 2 nd FEBRUARY, 2021.

Heard Shri Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Barabde, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1, Shri Bhise, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri Karode, learned counsel for respondent no.3.

(2) By approaching this Court the petitioner set up a challenge to the order dated 31.12.2020 passed by the respondent No.1 - Tahsildar and Returning Officer of Gram Panchayat, Khandavi, Taluka Jalgaon (Jamod), District Buldana, whereby the Returning Officer rejected the nomination papers of the petitioner from Ward No.1 for the seat of General category for Gram Panchayat, Khandavi. (3) When this writ petition came up before this Court on 04.01.2021, this Court (Coram:Manish Pitale,J.) by interim order directed that the nomination papers of the petitioner be accepted and the petitioner was allowed to

32a wp130.21.odt contest the election. At the same time, Court observed that it shall be subject to result of this writ petition. (4) The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that this writ petition is not maintainable in view of the law laid-down by the Full Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (stamp) No. 26 of 2021 and other connected writ petition dated 13.01.2021. The Full Bench has laid-down the law that against the rejection of the nomination papers, the writ petition is not maintainable.

(5) Since the writ petition itself is not maintainable and result of the election was subject to result of this writ petition. In view of the Full Bench's decision, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, consequence of dismissal of writ petition to follow. No order as to costs.

(6) Needless to mention, the interim order dated 04.01.2021 stands vacated.

JUDGE Wagh