← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/241/2020allowed

M. I. D. C. Through Its Area Manager, Acting For Regional Manager, Nagpur v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Collector, Chandrapur And Others

2025-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil2 pages

1 13A.cao.211.2020

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.214 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.3046 OF 2019 MIDC ..vs..

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 241 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.272 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.2997 OF 2019 MIDC ..vs..

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.25262 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.3302 OF 2019 MIDC ..vs..

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.236 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.2975 OF 2019 MIDC ..vs..

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicants/appellant. Shri H.D. Futane, AGP for the State.

CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 19/09/2025.

Heard.

2.

By these applications, the applicants/appellants are seeking condonation of delay in preferring the applications for restoration of appeals and restoration of first appeals, which were dismissed due to non-removal of office objection by the Registrar (Judicial).

2 13A.cao.211.2020 3.

In view of deposit of decretal amount in the execution proceedings and the matters have been settled before the Executing Court, the applications are allowed and disposed of.

First Appeal St. Nos.3046, 2997, 3302 and 2975 of 2019. 4.

In the said First Appeals, in view of deposit of entire decretal amount before the Executing Court, the appellants do not want to prosecute the present appeals. 5.

Moreover, the Civil Applications for condonation of delay and the first appeals are not yet registered, hence appellants seek withdrawal of the appeals and refund of court fee.

6.

All present first appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

7.

The Registry is directed to verify the position and refund the court fee to the appellants/applicants in the matters as per Rules.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL , J.

) Trupti