Ramesh Sitaramji Hiwarkar v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Revenue And Forest Department, Mumbai And Others

cao188.20 14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAO NO.188/2020 IN MCA ST.NO.292/2020 IN W.P.ST.NO.15621/2019 Ramesh Sitaramji Hiwarkar ..vs..

State of Mah., thr. Secretary Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors ................................................................................................................................................................... OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri G.N.Khanzode, Counsel for the Applicant. Mrs.Mrunal Barabde, AGP for the State.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 08 , 2021.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

These are applications for condonation of delay and for restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed by the Registrar (J) vide order dated 7.10.2019. 3.

For non-removal of office objections, the writ petition was dismissed by the Registrar (J). The petition was not even registered when the writ petition was dismissed by order of the Registrar.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that if the writ petition is restored, he will remove office objections within a period of two weeks from today positively. 5.

After having gone through contents of applications, I am of view that the applicant has made out a case in his favour.

6.

Consequently, applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Order of the Registrar (J) is set aside. The writ petition stamp is restored to its file. The petitioner shall .....2/-

cao188.20 14 remove office objections positively within a period of two weeks from today.

7.

Both civil applications are disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-