← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1126/2016disposed off

Mrs. Tasneem Khan Wife Of Haji Shamin Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Ministry Of Transport Mantralaya Mumbai And Others

2022-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani6 pages

1/6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR OF 20 Petitioners

1. Pawan s/o Ashok Arora, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, Resident of Janak Society, Vinayak Nagar, Sector-8, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh.

2. Jatin s/o Ashok Arora, Aged 26 years, Occ. Business, Resident of Janak Society, Vinayak Nagar, Sector-8, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh.

Both the petitioners through their Power of Attorney Shri Sitaram s/o Nathuram Gupta, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Working with petitioners, Resident of Chetgiri Colony, Chattarpur, At and Post Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh.

through its Secretary, Ministry of Transport, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2. Chief Manager, Dr. Anandrao Nair Marg, Mumbai - 400 008.

3. Divisional Manager, State Transport Corporation, Amravati Depot, Amravati.

4. Divisional Manager, State Transport Corporation, Akola.

W ITH

2/6 OF Petitioner Mrs. Tasneem Khan wife of Haji Shamim Khan, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Business, Resident of Mahaveer Ward, Multai, District Betul, Madhya Pradesh.

through its Secretary, Ministry of Transport, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032.

2. Chief Manager, Dr. Anandrao Nair Marg, Mumbai - 400 008.

3. Divisional Manager, State Transport Corporation, Amravati Depot, Amravati.

WITH OF Petitioner Mrs. Anjali Shivkumar Sharma, Aged 48 years, Occupation : Business, Resident of Alakhdham Nagar, Ujjain, District Ujjain.

1. The State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Department of Transport Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The State Transport Authority, Maharashtra State, 3rd & 4th Floor, Administrative Building, Near Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Garden, Government Colony, Bandra (East), Mumbai-51, through its Secretary.

3/6

3. The Managing Director & Vice Chairman, Dr. Anandrao Nayar Road, Mumbai - 400 008.

4. The Divisional Controller, Buldhana Region, having its Office at Nandura Road, Buldhana.

5. The Depot Manager, Shegaon Bus Depot, Shegaon.

6. The Depot Manager, Khamgaon Bus Depot, Khamgaon.

7. The Depot Manager, Malkapur Bus Depot, Malkapur.

WITH OF Petitioners

1. M/s. Kanker Roadways, A partnership Firm through its Managing Partner, Shri Navsharan s/o Pritamsingh Garcha, Aged about 36 years, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhatisgarh.

2. Mahendra Madhukar Luley, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Business, having its Office at Ashirwad Complex, Baidyanath Chowk, Great Nag Road, Nagpur - 440018.

4/6 through its Secretary, Ministry of Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032.

2. Regional Transport Authority, having its Office at 3rd and 4th Floor, Administrative Building, Opp. Dr. Ambedkar Udyan, Government Colony, Bandra (East), Mumbai.

3. Regional Transport Officer, Nagpur City, Giripeth, Amravati Road, Nagpur.

4. Regional Transport Officer (Rural), having its Office at Lal Godam, Indora, Nagpur.

5. Collector, Nagpur.

6. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic), having its Office at Opp. Punam Plaza, Civil Lines, Nagpur.

7. Chief Manager, Dr. Anandrao Nair Marg, Mumbai - 400008

8. Divisional Manager, Nagpur Division, Nagpur.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. N.C. Phadnis, Advocate for the Petitioner(s) in WP Nos.6510/13, 1126/16 & 6335/17.

Mr. U.A. Gosavi, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No.2296/14. Mrs. S.S. Jachak, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 in WP Nos.6510/13, 1126/16 & 2296/14 and for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 in WP No.6335/17. Mr. V.H. Kedar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in WP No.6510/13, for 2 & 3 in WP No.1126/16, for Respondent Nos.3 to 7 in WP No.2296/14 and for Respondent Nos.7 & 8 in WP No.6335/17.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

CORAM:

A.S. CHANDURKAR AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.

DATE :

th OCTOBER, 2022.

5/6 COMMON

JUDGMENT

: (Per A.S. Chandurkar, J.) All the petitioners hold interstate permits enabling them to operate their vehicles in the States of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. This was in view of a Reciprocal Transport Agreement entered into between the State of Maharashtra and the State of Madhya Pradesh on 01/03/2007 under Section 88(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. A notification in that regard was issued by the Home Department of the State of Maharashtra. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite such Reciprocal Transport Agreement, the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation was not permitting the petitioners to park their buses at the bus-stations operated by the Corporation in the State of Maharashtra. In that backdrop, these writ petitions came to be filed.

02] On 04/02/2015, this Court passed an interim order and directed the Corporation to permit the petitioners to park their vehicles in obedience to obligation cast upon them as per the Reciprocal Transport Agreement entered into on 15/01/1988. In terms of that interim order, the petitioners have been parking their vehicles accordingly.

03] It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Corporation that the Corporation has proposed an amendment to the Reciprocal Transport

6/6 Agreement in Clauses 7 (g) and 10(s). It is further submitted that until such amendment is effected in terms of Section 88 of the said Act, the interim arrangement, which is operating, could be permitted to continue and as and when a fresh Reciprocal Transport Agreement is entered into/existing agreement is duly amended, the parties would be governed by the present arrangement.

04] The learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of the interim order till such time the existing Reciprocal Transport Agreement is either amended or it is replaced by any fresh Reciprocal Transport Agreement.

05] In the light of aforesaid, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing that the interim arrangement as permitted by the order dated 04/02/2015 shall continue to operate till such period the existing Reciprocal Transport Agreement dated 01/03/2007 is either suitably modified or is replaced by a new Reciprocal Transport Agreement. Rule is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) *sandesh Signed by:SANDESH DAULATRAO WAGHMARE Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge Date :12.10.2022 19:15