← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/76/2009dismissed

Vikrant Pralhadrao Kate v. Vitthalrao Gangaram Deshmukh And Anor.

2024-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare1 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:1231 1 sa 76.2009.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Second Appeal No.

of 20 [Vikrant S/o Pralhadrao Kate ..vs.. Vitthal S/o Gangaram Deshmukh and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J .

DATED : 31-01 -202 The remark of Registry indicates that till date, Advocate for appellant has not filed copy of judgment and decree of trial Court.

None present for the appellant.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed under Order XLI Rule 17 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

Copy of order be served upon the appellant for taking appropriate steps, if so desired.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik