← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/83/2022allowed

Union Of India, Through The General Manager Of Railway, New Delhi And Another v. Marotrao S/O Bapurao Pillewar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Vitthal Marotrao Pillewar And Others

2022-02-11Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai2 pages

1 16 caf 83-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 83 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 207 OF 2021 Union of India through General Manager of Railway, Mantralaya, New Delhi and another ..vs..

Marotrao S/o Baurao Pillewar (Dead) through his L.Rs. Vitthal Marotrao Pillewar and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.P. Joshi, Advocate for appellant Ms S.S. Wandile, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2-A Shri A.M. Kadukar, A.G.P. for respondent No.3 CORAM :

SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI , J.

DATED :

11/02/ Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

By order dated 08/09/2021, the respondents, who are the original applicants in the land reference, were permitted to withdraw the compensation deposited by the acquiring body.

3.

The Registry has raised objection to disburse the amount to respondent no.2, since the name in the cause title has been recorded as Chandrakala Katashwarwar. The applicant has placed on record, copy of the Government Gazette dated 28/01/2022 which reveals that the name of respondent no.2 is changed from Chandrakala w/o Jayantrao Katashwarwar to Nanda Jayantrao Katashwarwar. In

2 16 caf 83-2022 view of the change of name, the amount payable to respondent no.2 Chandrakala w/o Jayantrao Kateshwarwar, the amount payable to respondent no.2 be paid to her Attorney holder Dilip Pillewarrespondent no.2C. Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (i) and is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE R.S. Sahare Signed By:RANJANA SAMEER SAHARE