Kunal @ Golu Anil Jaiswal v. The Divisional Commissioner Nagpur Division And Another
WP7-18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 7/2018 (KUNAL @ GOLU ANIL JAISWAL (IN JAIL) VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. Sunita Paul, Appointed Counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.M. Lonare, A.P.P. for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 23 , 2018.
By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur dated 12.07.2017 rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of parole leave. It appears that the father of the petitioner was not well during the beginning of the year 2017 and the petitioner had applied for grant of parole leave. The parole leave application of the petitioner was rejected on 12.07.2017. More than eight months have lapsed from the date of the impugned order. The application of the petitioner is rejected as there were other members in the family to look after the father of the petitioner. Since the father of the petitioner was not well nearly a year earlier, it cannot be said that he is still unwell and requires care.
In this view of the matter, it would be necessary to dispose of this criminal writ petition. However, the petitioner would be free to apply for grant of parole leave if his father is ill in future. With these observations, we dispose of the writ petition. JUDGE JUDGE APTE