Shri Surendra Manoharrao Shyamkul v. Union Of India,Through Its Ministry Of Human Resources Hrd Department Of Higher Education, New Delh

WP1114-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1114/2014 (SURENDRA MANOHARRAO SHYAMKUL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Y.B. Mandpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.A. Chaudhari, counsel for the R-1.

Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, counsel for the R-2 to 4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 18 , 2016.

Shri Mandpe, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that though an alternate remedy was available, the petitioner has mistakenly filed a writ petition. It is stated that the petitioner is desirous of availing the alternate remedy. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition so that the alternate remedy could be availed.

Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted.

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The points raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE APTE