← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/30/2019rejected

Pranay S/O. Prakash Navnage(In Jail) v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ajni,

2019-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar2 pages

ba30.19 16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.30/2019 Pranay s/o Prakash Navnage ..vs..

The State of Mah., thr. PSO PS Ajni, District Nagpur ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Shri C.R.Thakur, Counsel for the Applicant.

Mrs.M.H.Deshmukh, Addl.P.P. for the State.

CORAM

: M.G.GIRATKAR, J.

DATED : MARCH 27, 2019.

1.

Heard learned counsel Shri C.R.Thakur for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mrs.H.H.Deshmukh for the State.

2.

Learned counsel Shri C.R.Thakur for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since last 23 months. Though the Trial Court started recording of evidence, there are 74 witnesses shown in chargesheet and there is no likelihood of conclusion of Trial in near future. Therefore, learned counsel prays for grant of bail. 3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mrs.M.H.Deshmukh for the State strongly objects the present application. She submits that material witnesses are examined and the Trial is likely to be completed within a short period and, therefore, the application is liable to be rejected.

4.

Perusal of order of Sessions Court shows that .....2/-

ba30.19 16 directions were given by this Court to decide the matter expeditiously. Therefore, it is clear that the Trial Court is making every attempt to decide the matter expeditiously. 5.

The prosecution may cite thousands of witnesses, that does not mean that each and every witness should be examined. The prosecutor has to decide who are material witnesses. 74 witnesses are shown in chargesheet. That does not mean that all witnesses are going to be examined by the prosecutor.

6.

In that view of the matter, the criminal application stands rejected and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-