Bombay High CourtWP/361/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Sharad Shankarrao Dahedar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Industries, Energy And Labour, Mantralaya Mumbai And Others

2016-07-11Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

WP361-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 361/2016 (SHARAD SHANKARRAO DABEDAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.A. Vishwarupe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Madiwale, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri D.N. Kukday, counsel for the R-2 to 4.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 11 , 2016.

The only prayer made by the petitioner in the instant petition is for a direction to the respondent nos.2 and 3 to pay the gratuity and the amount payable towards leave encashment, to the petitioner.

Shri Kukday, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4, states on instructions that the respondent nos.2 and 3 would be releasing the amount that is due and payable to the petitioner within a period of four weeks. It is stated that no dues are found against the petitioner and, hence, the amount that is liable to be paid, would be released.

By accepting the statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3, that would be binding on the respondent nos.2 and 3, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE