Bombay High CourtCAW/44/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Tarachand S/O Panchamji Tandekar v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Water Survey Development, Mumbai And Others

2017-02-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

WP3926-01 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3926/2001 (TARACHAND PANCHAMJI TANDEKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Palshikar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.M. Joshi, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 10 , 2017.

Shri Palshikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that despite taking serious efforts to ensure that the petitioner should give instructions in this old matter, that was filed in the year 2001, the petitioner is not responding and has not contacted the counsel. It is stated that in the absence of any instructions about the status as on today, the learned counsel would not be in a position to work out the matter.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

With the disposal of the writ petition, C.A.W. No.44 of 2016 also stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE