Bombay High CourtWP/1228/2017dismissedrule discharged

Vinod S/O Keshaorao Vitonde v. The Superintendent, Rashtra Apang Karmashala, Amravati And Others

2020-01-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.V. Ghuge1 pages

1 wp1228.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1228/2017 Vinod S/o Keshaorao Vitonde ..V/s..

The Superintendent, Rashtra Apang Karmashala, Amravati and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Badhe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R. Vaidya, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 20.1.2020.

1] The learned Advocate for the petitioner mentioned this matter out of turn which is at serial No.201 on the final hearing board dated 20.1.2020. It is submitted that the order under challenge is dated 28.6.2016 by which the Industrial Court has concluded that the petitioner is not an industry under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and complaint (ULP) No.16/2014 was not maintainable.

2] It is, therefore, submitted on instructions that the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition so as to avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law. 3] Considering the above, this petition is disposed off. If the petitioner has a statutory remedy available, he may avail of the same as may be permissible in law.

4] Rule is discharged.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Tambaskar.