Bombay High CourtCAW/65/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Shri. Bhupesh Tukaram Meshram v. Union Of Indian Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi And 3 Others

2016-01-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP1101-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.65/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1101/2015 (BHUPESH TUKARAM MESHRAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.B. Moon, counsel for the petitioner.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 21 , 2016.

Heard. Perused the proposed amendment.

The proposed amendment is necessary for effectively deciding the writ petition.

The civil application is allowed and disposed of. The amendment should be carried out within a period of ten days.

Stand over after three weeks for further consideration. JUDGE JUDGE APTE