Bombay High CourtCP/23/2016dismissedrule discharged

Dr. Swapnil S/O. Narhari Khorgade v. Smt. Abha Chaturvedi, The Sect. Lokmanya Tilak Jan Kalyan Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur And Another

2016-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

cp.23.16 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.23 OF 2016 (Dr. Swapnil s/o Narhari Khorgade vs. Smt. Abha Chaturvedi and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM

: Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 5 th FEBRUARY, 2016.

Heard Shri B.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the petitioner.

The petitioner has made a grievance that the order passed by the University and College Tribunal, Nagpur is not being complied by the respondents.

The petitioner has alternate appropriate remedy available under Section 66 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. In view of this, I am not inclined to exercise the jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the present.

The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the University and College Tribunal in the matter. The petition is dismissed in the above terms. No costs.

JUDGE *sandesh