Rajesh S/O. Ashok Yadav v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Pachpaoli Police Station Nagpur And Others

1 4.appeal.12.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.12/2017 Rajesh S/o. Ashok Yadav Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Mayuri Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent(s)/State. CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ .

DATED : 18/11/2022.

.

This is an appeal challenging the order of acquittal as regards to the respondents in MCOCA Case No.5/2013.

2.

This Court time and again directed the appellant (Informant) to supply the copies for service, however, it has not been complied. Noting non-compliance, this Court vide order dated 21.09.2022 directed the appellant to deposit costs of Rs.3000/-, which were not paid. On the last date, the appellant was cautioned that if he fails to deposit the costs, further necessary orders would be passed.

3.

In view of that, for non-compliance of the order, appeal stands disposed of for want of prosecution. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.) RGurnule MANOJ MANDADE 15:27