Dr. Ribha W/O Rajiv Chawla v. Appropriate Authority/Health Officer (M, City Of Nagpur Muncipal Corporation And Another

1 wp519.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 519 OF 2015.

(DR. RIBHA RAJIV CHAWLA..VS..APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY/HEALTH OFFICER, NMC, NGP. & ANR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JULY 03, 2015.

Heard Mr. M. Anilkumar, the learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. J.B. Kasat, the learned advocate for the respondent No.1 and Ms M.N. Hiwase, the learned A.G.P. for the respondent No.2.

The petitioner has challenged the decision of the respondent No.1/Appropriate Authority suspending her registration under the provisions of Section 20 of the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Selection) Act, 1994 and the order passed by the respondent No.2 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner.

Mr.Kasat, the learned advocate for the respondent No.1 states that the registration of the petitioner was till 2014 and as the period of registration is over the decision of the respondent No.1-Appropriate Authority, suspending the registration, automatically comes to an end.

Accepting the submission made on behalf of the respondent No.1, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

2 wp519.15 Needless to say that the application of the petitioner for renewal of the registration shall be considered according to law.

JUDGE RRaut..