Bombay High CourtCP/79/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Rajendra Balaji Tidke v. Shri J.S. Sahariya Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai And 5 Others

2015-03-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale1 pages

43cp79.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.P.No.79 of 2014 in W.P.No.3046 of 1995 (D) (Rajendra Balaji Tidke .vs. J.S.Sahariya, Secretary, Edu. Deptt. and Ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.M.V.Samarth, Adv. for the petitioner.

Mr.N.R.Rode, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2.

Mr.A.Z.Jibhkate, Adv. for respondent no.3.

Mr.S.P.Palshikar, Adv. for respondent nos. 4 and 5. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 4.3.2015.

Heard.

It is not in dispute that the orders of this Court are complied with. It appears from the arguments of Mr.M.V.Samarth, learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is aggrieved by the determination in respect of entitlement of the petitioner to the pay-scale of graduate teacher. It is open to the petitioner to challenge that determination in accordance with law. Hence, the present Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal