Bombay High CourtCAO/100/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Washim v. Maroti Bhujanga Kalbande And Others

2018-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

CA96-18 and ors..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

CAO 96 of 2018 in MCA (St) 953/18 in FA (St) No.4362/2017 (Rej. F.A. No.572/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Devisingh Premsingh Rathod and others. ) CAO 97 of 2018 in MCA (St) 965/18 in FA (St) No.4329/2017 (Rej. F.A. No.593/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Bhavsingh Premsingh Rathod and others. ) CAO 98 of 2018 in MCA (St) 951/18 in FA (St) No.8103/2017 (Rej. F.A. No.676/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Dnyanba Sitaram Mapari and others. ) CAO 99 of 2018 in MCA (St) 967/18 in FA (St) No.20995/2016 (Rej. F.A. No.463/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs.Rameshrao Dnyanbarao Gawali and others. ) CAO 100 of 2018 in MCA (St) 945/18 in FA (St) No.17165/2016 (Rej. F.A. No.

94/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Maroti Bhujanga Kalbande and others. ) CAO 101 of 2018 in MCA (St) 961/18 in FA (St) No.4350/2017 (Rej. F.A. No.594/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Ramkrushna Khanduji Navghare and others. ) CAO 102 of 2018 in MCA (St) 947/18 in FA (St) No.4366/2017 (Rej. F.A. No.592/17) (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim .vs. Sitaram Bhika Jadhav and others. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Mr. Anoop Parihar, Advocate for Appellants in all appeals. CORAM : Manish Pitale, J.

DATED : January 17, 2018.

These are applications for restoration of the appeals which stood rejected by the orders passed by

CA96-18 and ors..odt the Registrar on account of failure to remove ofÏce objections by the appellants. These applications are accompanied by applications for condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the applications, the said applications are allowed. The delay is condoned and the orders of the Registrar are recalled. The appeals are restored subject to the appellants removing the ofÏce objections within two weeks from today.

JUDGE halwai