← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/103/2019admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Smt. Nashina W/O Salimbhai Lalani v. The State Of Maharashtra, Department Of State Excise, Through Its Secretary, Mumbai And Others

2019-03-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak1 pages

0603caw104.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAW NO. 104/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2034 OF 2018 (Smt. Nashina w/o Salimbhai Lalani vs. State of Maharashtra, Department of State Excise thr. its Secretary & Ors.) (Dr. Savita Suresh Potdukhe - Applicant/ Intervener) AND CAW NO. 103/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2035 OF 2018 (Smt. Nashina w/o Salimbhai Lalani vs. State of Maharashtra, Department of State Excise thr. its Secretary & Ors.) (Dr. Savita Suresh Potdukhe - Applicant/ Intervener) _____________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

MARCH 06, 2019.

Heard Shri Uday Dastane, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.J. Kadu and Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, learned AGPs for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 7 in respective petitions, Shri A.S. Dhore, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 and Shri A.S. Kilor, learned counsel for the intervener. The learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if these applications are allowed.

In view of no objection and for the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. The petitioner is directed to join the applicant as party intervener in the petition. The necessary amendment be carried out on or before next date. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

List the matter on 20.03.2019.

JUDGE JUDGE *GS.