← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/5/2018dispossed offdismiss for default

Maharshtra Veej Grahak Sanghatana, Through Its Authorised Signatory, Shri Suhas Raghunath Khandekar v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Energy, Mumbai And Another

2018-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye1 pages

2802pil5.18 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.5 OF 2018 (Maharashtra Veej Grahak Sanghatana vs. State of Maharashtra and others) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri A.S. Kilor, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri S.A. Ashirgade, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no.1.

Shri Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate with Shri Ashish Singh, Advocate and Shri R.R. Pimpulkhute, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Shri Rohan Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent no.3. -------- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2018 Learned Senior Advocate Shri Manohar with Adv. Ashish Singh and Adv. R.R. Pimpulkhute for respondent no.2 states that the impugned Resolutions are being withdrawn within next three days and appropriate alternate arrangement is also being prescribed.

2) In this situation, we find that grievance of petitioner does not survive as his matter is not being subjected to impugned arrangement.

3) Accepting the aforesaid statement of learned Senior Advocate, we dispose of public interest litigation. JUDGE JUDGE khj