Subhash S/O. Satyawan Sutar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., Deulgaon(Raja) And Othr.

Order 1004apl150.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 150/2019.

Subhash Satyawan Sutar -VERSUSState of Maharashtra and others.

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri A.J. Thakkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S.M. Ukey, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1. CORAM : Z. A. HAQ AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 10, 2019.

Heard.

2.

Learned A.P.P. submitted that the investigation in the matter is at a very primary stage, and co-accused Badrinath Jagtap, is not traceable. In view of the submission made by the learned A.P.P., we showed our disinclination to consider the prayer for quashing of the FIR against the applicant, at this stage. 3.

Learned Advocate for the applicant, sought permission to withdraw the application, with liberty to reiterate his request after filing of the charge sheet. 4.

Criminal Application is disposed of as

Order 1004apl150.19 withdrawn, with liberty as sought for.

JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.