Rahul S/O Tukadu Karamkar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Planning Department, Mumbai And Others

wp.305.17 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.305 of 2017 Rahul s/o Tukadu Karamkar vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Chief Secretary, Planning Department, Mumbai & others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri V.R. Gawali, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Shamsi Haider, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4. Ms. M.P. Munshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

CORAM

: Z.A. HAQ & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 7 th JANUARY, 2020.

On objection taken by the learned A.G.P. and learned Advocate for respondent No.3 that the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy available before the Labour Court, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy.

The petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE *sandesh