Sau. Sadhana W/O Manoj Bansod v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Minister, Rural Development Deptt., Mumbai And Others

1 caw219&220.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAW) No. 219 of 2016 in Writ Petition No. 6772 of 2015 [Sau. Sadhana W/o Manoj Bansod Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Shri P. S. Wathore, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner Shri S. M. Bhagde, AGP for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 Shri A. Parihar, Advocate for the respondent nos. 3 & 4 CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J.

DATE : 9-2-2016.

Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that in view of the interim order directing the parties to maintain status quo dated 15-12-2015, the applicant/petitioner is not pressing the present application.

The application is, therefore, disposed of as not pressed.

Civil Application (CAW) No. 220 of 2016 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the petition, the appeal preferred by the petitioner itself is decided.

Shri Parihar, learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad and learned Assistant Government Pleader do not dispute the factual position of decision of the appeal.

.....2/-

2 caw219&220.16.odt In view of the above, the application is allowed.

The amendment be carried out within two weeks.

JUDGE wasnik ...../-