Dr. Sahebrao S/O Sampatrao Sakhre, And 8 Others v. State Of Maharshtra, Higher Education And Employment Exchange Dept., Through Secretary, And 4 Other

WP785-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 785/2014 (SAHEBRAO SAMPATRAO SAKHRE & OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Patil, counsel for the petitioners. Shri D.B. Patel, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 5.

Shri M.P. Khajanchi, counsel for the R-3 & 4. Shri Deopujari h/f Shri N.S. Badhe, counsel for the R-6. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 29 , 2015.

Heard.

The only prayer made by the petitioners is a direction to the respondent no.6-Grievance Committee to decide the complaint filed by the petitioners under Section 57 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, in the year 2013. It is stated that the complaint is not decided for nearly two years. Since the prayer made by the petitioners is innocuous, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no.6 to decide the complaint filed by the petitioners as early as possible and positively within a period of four months. It is needless to mention that the issues raised in the petition are kept open.

Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE