Manish Subhash Girhe v. Rupali Manish Girhe
1 14 wp 42.25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITOIN NO. 42/2025 (Manish Subhash Girhe Vs. Rupali w/o Manish Girhe & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. V.B. Bhise, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Gase, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR, J .
DATED : 18/12/2025.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2.
The order dated 13.09.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon Jamod in PWDVA 21/2016 and the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in PWDVA Appeal No. 24/2023 are under challenge, wherein the amount of Rs. 20,000/- was grated towards maintenance to the wife as well as to two daughters.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to pay Rs.15,000/- per month instead of Rs.20,000/- per month from the date of the application i.e. from 24.08.2016. To this, the learned counsel for the respondents agreed, therefore both the counsel submit that instead of going into the merits of the mater, the petition can be disposed of by accepting the statement. 4.
In view of above, the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he will pay Rs.15,000/- per month from the date of the application i.e.
2 14 wp 42.25 from 24.08.2016 is accepted. The learned counsel for respondents has accepted that he is ready to accept Rs. 15,000/- per month from the date of application. However, it is clarified that in future, if as per need, wife filed any proceedings for enhancement then concerned Court shall decide the same on its own merits. In this view of the matter, petition stands disposed of.
( M. M. NERLIKAR , J.) Gohane